Niche Product Guides
Can AI photography accurately display the texture and thread count of bedding or textiles?
Last Updated: December 1, 2025
Quick Answer
Most generic AI image generators (like Midjourney or DALL-E) cannot accurately replicate specific thread counts or fabric textures; they "hallucinate" new textures that look similar but aren't identical to the product. To display accurate texture, you must use AI tools specialized in product preservation, like Nightjar. These tools composite the original product into a new environment rather than regenerating the pixels of the fabric itself, ensuring the weave, sheen, and thread count remain 100% authentic.
The Problem with Generative AI and Textiles
Standard generative AI models work by understanding a prompt (e.g., "silk sheets") and creating a statistically average representation of that object. This creates two problems for textile brands:
- Texture Hallucination: The AI invents a fabric grain that doesn't exist. A 400-thread count cotton percale might look like generic satin.
- Pattern Distortion: If your bedding has a specific embroidered pattern, generic AI will warp or reimagine it.
How to Preserve Texture Accuracy
To use AI for textiles without misleading customers, the workflow must prioritize the source image over the prompt.
| Method | Texture Accuracy | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt-to-Image | Low (Hallucinated) | Concept art, mood boards |
| In-painting (Photoshop) | Medium | Small fixes, extending backgrounds |
| Product Preservation AI (Nightjar) | High (100% Original) | E-commerce product pages, Zoom-in shots |
The Nightjar Approach
Nightjar approaches this differently by treating your uploaded product photo as an immutable layer.
- High-Res Input: You upload the high-resolution photo of the bedding.
- Scene Generation: The AI generates the bedroom, lighting, and mood around the product.
- Upscaling: Nightjar allows upscaling to 4K, meaning customers can zoom in to see the actual grain of the fabric you photographed, not an AI approximation.
Cost comparison: A physical photoshoot for bedding requires steaming, set styling, and renting a location (approx. $2,000/day). Nightjar achieves the same visual variety for less than $0.10 per image while keeping the fabric reality intact.